The American Convention on Human Rights, the National Constitution of the Republic of Paraguay of 1992 and the Control of Conventionality
Keywords:
Competent Authority, Conventionality Control, Human Rights, State, Legislation, SanctionsAbstract
The present work based its study on the application of the Conventionality Control doctrine for decision-making by a Competent Authority in the exercise of its profession.
Several sources have been used, such as international human rights instruments, the review of the literature that addresses this issue and the description of cases, allowed to know its application more widely.
Also emphasizing the importance of the recommendations made to the Paraguayan State, on the promotion and protection of human rights of the Regional or Inter-American Human Rights System (SIDH) indistinctly, taking into account that there are several international instruments, they have been ratified by laws and that are part of the positive internal legal system of the Republic of Paraguay as a guarantor of rights.
References
Allen, M. E. (s.f.). Control De Convencionalidad: Herramienta De Uso Obligatorio. Disponible en: https://www.pj.gov.py. , 2-14.
Carbonell, M. (2016). Introducción General Al Control. Mexico: a Biblioteca Jurídica Virtual del Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la UNAM
Camarillo G., L. A. Rosas R., E. N. (2016). El control de convencionalidad como consecuencia de las decisiones judiciales de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos . Revista IIDH , 129.
Sampieri, R. H. (2006). Elaboracion del Marco Teorico, revision de literatura y construccion de una perspectiva teorica en Metodologia de la Investigacion.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alice Ines Rotela Fisch
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todo el contenido de esta revista, está bajo 